IMD business school for management and leadership courses

Latest Case Studies
Case Study
DNB Bank: Embracing startups as a growth strategy

The case examines how DNB Bank, Norway’s largest financial services company, reshaped its growth strategy by focusing on startups and SMEs, a segment traditionally considered unprofitable. In 2013, DNB launched a bold SME strategy, deliberately choosing a gross approach to win new startups early in their life cycle rather than a net approach foc…

Strategy Customer Centricity Business to Business
By Goutam Challagalla, Francis D. Kim and Philip Charles Zerrillo
Case reference: IMD-2706, © 2025
DNB Bank: Embracing startups as a growth strategy
By Goutam Challagalla Francis D. Kim and Philip Charles Zerrillo
Case reference: IMD-2706 ©2025
Summary
The case examines how DNB Bank, Norway’s largest financial services company, reshaped its growth strategy by focusing on startups and SMEs, a segment traditionally considered unprofitable. In 2013, DNB launched a bold SME strategy, deliberately choosing a gross approach to win new startups early in their life cycle rather than a net approach focused on the profitability of existing accounts. This strategy, enabled by a significant investment in digitalization and a cultural shift toward customer lifecycle engagement, generated exceptional results and by 2025, the SME segment delivered the highest return on allocated capital. The journey, however, was not linear. A European regulatory crackdown in 2019, following the Danske Bank money laundering scandal, forced DNB to shift its focus from growth to compliance. The bank reallocated 1,000 employees to KYC units, dismantling its startup-friendly onboarding process and causing customer acquisition to stall. As competitors advanced, DNB had to orchestrate a strategic Restart effort to rebuild its SME leadership. This involved launching superior digital tools, providing automated lending decisions within a minute, and renewing its customer-centric focus. By 2025, the recovery was well underway, with one in three Norwegian SMEs banking with DNB. The case challenges students to evaluate DNB’s past choices, the critical balance between growth and compliance, and the future of SME banking as AI and digital agents transform customer interactions.
Reference IMD-2706
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization DNB Bank
Industry Finance and Insurance, Banking
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
MedTech Diagnostics’ transformation crossroads

The case study examines the organizational transformation challenges faced by MedTech Diagnostics, an $850 million medical diagnostics company attempting to balance innovation speed with regulatory compliance and quality standards. CEO Patricia Chen must navigate the tension between traditional, reliability-focused operations and agile innovatio…

Organizational Change Agility Business Transformation Leadership
By Michael D. Watkins
Case reference: IMD-2726, © 2025
MedTech Diagnostics’ transformation crossroads
By Michael D. Watkins
Case reference: IMD-2726 ©2025
Summary
The case study examines the organizational transformation challenges faced by MedTech Diagnostics, an $850 million medical diagnostics company attempting to balance innovation speed with regulatory compliance and quality standards. CEO Patricia Chen must navigate the tension between traditional, reliability-focused operations and agile innovation pods, while facing a critical contract renewal worth $187 million that represents 22% of the company’s revenue. The case illustrates the complexities of dual operating models in regulated industries. MedTech’s traditional divisions generate $120M in EBITDA and are FDA-compliant but are declining at 8% annually. Innovation pods achieve 120% growth and high customer satisfaction but face higher post-market issues and lower FDA approval rates. Hybrid teams – intended as a compromise – satisfy neither approach, demonstrating the difficulties of organizational ambidexterity. Chen faces three strategic options: controlled evolution over 24 months, creating a separate subsidiary for innovation, or transforming into a platform company. Each option carries significant costs, risks, and uncertain outcomes. The case explores critical organizational design questions, including culture change, stakeholder management, resource allocation, regulatory navigation, and leadership alignment in transformation contexts. Key themes include managing organizational culture during transformation, balancing innovation with quality in regulated environments, addressing internal resistance and political dynamics, developing effective dual operating systems, and making high-stakes strategic decisions under uncertainty. The case is designed for classroom discussion on organizational change, innovation management, and strategic decision-making in complex operating environments.
Reference IMD-2726
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization MedTech Diagnostics (Fictionalized)
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
The power of brand-led differentiation: What Vanzetti Engineering learned from luxury brands (B) (Video case)

This case series explores what companies can learn from luxury brands without becoming luxury brands themselves. The video B case features interviews with three Vanzetti Engineering executives: the marketing director, the CEO and owner and the chief commercial officer. With the shrinking of the automobile industry, the company has had to reposit…

Luxury Marketing Strategy
By Stéphane J. G. Girod and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-2696, © 2025
The power of brand-led differentiation: What Vanzetti Engineering learned from luxury brands (B) (Video case)
By Stéphane J. G. Girod and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-2696 ©2025
Summary
This case series explores what companies can learn from luxury brands without becoming luxury brands themselves. The video B case features interviews with three Vanzetti Engineering executives: the marketing director, the CEO and owner and the chief commercial officer. With the shrinking of the automobile industry, the company has had to reposition itself in other industrial sectors where it is significantly smaller than the customers. Vanzetti Engineering embraced some of the codes of luxury branding according to what suited it and ignored others. The company discovered that although it was focused mostly on creating functional value, it had to dwell much more on emotional and societal value creation. The process of brand elevation required a complete cultural transformation, and one of the lessons from the case is that a brand is not a slogan but a way of being and of delivering value.
Reference IMD-2696
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Vanzetti Engineering
Industry Construction and Engineering;Manufacturing
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
The power of brand-led differentiation: What Vanzetti Engineering learned from luxury brands (A)

Survey after survey shows that executives think their business is in danger of being commoditized. This means their company is not able to differentiate sufficiently to command higher market prices and profits. Luxury brands, by contrast, are the opposite of commodity. Their whole approach to branding is based on desirability. This case series e…

Luxury Marketing Strategy
By Stéphane J. G. Girod and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-2688, © 2025
The power of brand-led differentiation: What Vanzetti Engineering learned from luxury brands (A)
By Stéphane J. G. Girod and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-2688 ©2025
Summary
Survey after survey shows that executives think their business is in danger of being commoditized. This means their company is not able to differentiate sufficiently to command higher market prices and profits. Luxury brands, by contrast, are the opposite of commodity. Their whole approach to branding is based on desirability. This case series explores what companies can learn from luxury brands without becoming luxury brands themselves. The written A case gives a short background on Vanzetti Engineering, which is facing intensifying competition in an evolving marketplace, and launches the first question for discussion.
Reference IMD-2688
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Vanzetti Engineering
Industry Construction and Engineering;Manufacturing
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
Evoco AG: Unlocking private equity potential

Michel Galeazzi and Felix Ackermann, founding partners of the private equity firm Evoco, sat with the rest of the team pondering the latest strategic issues. Evoco had evolved significantly as a fund manager since its creation in 2012, taking advantage of newly identified opportunities and developing novel competencies. Its first three funds ha…

Entrepreneurship Finance Venture Capital
By Benoit F. Leleux and Ricardo Rodriguez Plazas
Case reference: IMD-2689, © 2025
Evoco AG: Unlocking private equity potential
By Benoit F. Leleux and Ricardo Rodriguez Plazas
Case reference: IMD-2689 ©2025
Summary
Michel Galeazzi and Felix Ackermann, founding partners of the private equity firm Evoco, sat with the rest of the team pondering the latest strategic issues. Evoco had evolved significantly as a fund manager since its creation in 2012, taking advantage of newly identified opportunities and developing novel competencies. Its first three funds had an excellent track record, which provided a strong platform to continue learning and to evolve the business models of its funds. Evoco’s founding premise was to develop business solutions for governance and liquidity issues that emerged in private equity, creating investment opportunities for its investors in the process. The first two funds, Evoco TSE I and II, focused primarily on developing secondary solutions for liquidity and governance issues in private equity, i.e. acquiring portfolios of positions in late-stage or undermanaged buyout funds, and creating value by accelerating exits and engineering a palette of value-creating, hands-on strategic initiatives. The sellers typically required liquidity for some reason, e.g. new investment paradigms, better allocation opportunities or team reorganization. With Evoco TSE III, the strategy was refined, opening the door to single-asset deals and ever more original value creation interventions facilitated by majority ownership positions. When US President Donald Trump announced a tsunami of new tariffs on ‘Liberation Day’ 2 April 2025, the world of trade and industry was thrown into disarray, and private equity with it. Would it make sense to capitalize on the upheaval by tweaking the firm’s strategy again to fine-tune an even more compelling investment proposition? Which direction should that take?
Reference IMD-2689
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Evoco
Industry Finance and Insurance, Private Equity
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications