Ref: IMD-3-2264

Case study

Reference: IMD-3-2264

Order this case study

Terracycle (C): Eco-capitalism and “upcycling” waste

By John Stuart Read, Philippe Margery and Jan Lepoutre

In 2001 Tom Szaky, a Princeton freshman, founded TerraCycle with the hope of creating perfect eco-capitalism. His idea was a company built on waste – worm waste to be exact. To help fund his fledgling company, Tom entered and won several business plan contests – though he turned down his biggest prize of US$1million because it came with strings attached that conflicted with his aspirations for the firm. Eventually, Tom dropped out of Princeton to pursue his dream of eliminating waste and the company expanded into upcycling – making products from waste that would otherwise have been sent to landfills. Eventually, the company moved into sponsored waste, whereby companies would pay it to set up collection sites, or brigades as TerraCycle called them, for used packaging associated with their brands. TerraCycle would take challenging-to-recycle packaging and turn it into affordable, high-quality products. Ten years later, TerraCycle’s eco-friendly products had received numerous environmental accolades, partnerships with multinationals such as Kraft, SmithKline Beecham and L’Oréal, and the company’s upcycled products were sold at major retailers from Home Depot to Walmart. But profits continued to elude the company, and Tom found himself at a crossroads. Learning objectives: Each case in the five-part series addresses a key managerial issue at a crucial point in the company’s evolution. The series provides an excellent illustration of the transformation process entrepreneurs go through to ensure their company not only survives but also thrives during each phase of its development. The case series lends itself perfectly to active participation by students. The first three cases demonstrate all five principles of effectuation through the decisions as well as some of the successes and some of the mistakes Tom and his team made. Each case in the series ends at a crucial decision point that will push participants to think hard about: 1) the role of resources (investment and non-cash resources) in new venture creation; 2) the tradeoffs of ownership and control; 3) Building partnerships with consumers, multinationals and government; 4) the importance of the role of management as ventures evolve; 5) effectual partnership and contingency. This case series is ideal for a four-hour session (or two 120-minute sessions or three 90-minute sessions). There is also a compiled version of the case, which works well in a single 90 minute teaching session.

Learning Objective

Each case in the five-part series addresses a key managerial issue at a crucial point in the company’s evolution.

The series provides an excellent illustration of the transformation process entrepreneurs go through to ensure their company not only survives but also thrives during each phase of its development.

The case series lends itself perfectly to active participation by students. The first three cases demonstrate all five principles of effectuation through the decisions as well as some of the successes and some of the mistakes Tom and his team made. Each case in the series ends at a crucial decision point that will push participants to think hard about: 1) the role of resources (investment and non-cash resources) in new venture creation; 2) the tradeoffs of ownership and control; 3) Building partnerships with consumers, multinationals and government; 4) the importance of the role of management as ventures evolve; 5) effectual partnership and contingency.

This case series is ideal for a four-hour session (or two 120-minute sessions or three 90-minute sessions). There is also a compiled version of the case, which works well in a single 90 minute teaching session.

KeywordsCompetitive Strategy, Effectuation, Entrepreneurship, Environmental Management, General Management, Innovation, Non-market Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy, Sustainability, Sustainable Development, Waste Management
SettingsAmerica
2001-2011
TypeField Research
Copyright©2011
LanguageEnglish
Order this case study

Reference: IMD-3-2264

IMD case studies are distributed through case clearing houses. In order to browse the collection and purchase copies please visit the links below.

The Case Centre Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Fax +44 (0)1234 751125
Email info@thecasecentre.org

The Case Centre Babson College

Babson Park Wellesley MA 02457, USA
Tel +1 781 239 5884
Fax +1 781 239 5885
Email info.usa@thecasecentre.org

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way Boston, MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email custserv@hbsp.harvard.edu

Case Center Japan

2nd Floor, Toranomon Jitsugyokaikan,
1-1-20 Toranomon, Minato-ku,
Tokyo 105-0001 Japan
Tel +81 3 3503 6621
Fax +81 3 3501 0550
Email info@casecenter.jp

Copyright information

IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information, please contact our Information Center.

Do you need more information?
Contact us for additional information or republishing

Case study

Reference: IMD-3-2264

Order this case study

Other case study in this series

Terracycle (B): A million tradeoffs

Other case study in this series

Terracycle (K): Branded waste

Other case study in this series

Terracycle: Outsmarting waste


Looking for something specific?

Keep reading

Back to top