Rethinking the smartphone supply chain: Oppo/Vivo's big bet
In this industry note, we explore recent changes in the smartphone market in China, which accounted for roughly one-third of worldwide mobile sales in 2016. International smartphone brands such as Apple and Samsung dominated China’s smartphone market in its early stages. Then, Xiaomi and Huawei, two Chinese brands, changed the story. In 2015, Xiaomi and Huawei were ranked No. 1 and No. 2, leaving Apple in third position and even squeezing Samsung out of the top 5. Just one year later, OPPO and VIVO (OV), two unfamiliar brands that had nevertheless been cultivating the market for years, overturned the ranking again. OV occupied the No. 1 and No. 3 positions in 2016, pushing Apple to fourth place. Samsung’s market share shrank even further. With the variety of players came a range of supply chain integration strategies and distribution channel models that raised interesting questions about the inherent risks and rewards and how they would affect this changing market going forward.
Given the diverse players and supply chain and marketing strategies in a fragmented market, how will the China smartphone market unfold? OV’s competence in distribution channels and marketing gave huge growth in 2016; it also gave cause for concern. How sustainable is the strategy, and can OV justify their increased production capacity? Can OV imitate Lenovo’s successful market penetration by targeting low tier cities and rural areas, or will the direct distribution model of competitors prevail?
IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications