Carlyle Group and the AZ-EM buyout (A2): Due diligence
Private equity managers are asked to make some of the most complex and gutsy investment decisions. Before any deal is completed, an information gathering and analysis process called due diligence is conducted to assess both the future upside of the potential investment and the possible downside.
The Carlyle Group was known as one of the most data-intensive private equity investors in the industry. Carlyle’s due diligence process in assessing the AZ-Electronic Materials (AZ-EM) deal was typical of its rigorous approach.
The due diligence process was significantly outsourced, with outside specialists hired in key administrative and operational areas and given very specific instructions by the private equity team. The due diligence conducted to evaluate AZ-EM was particularly intensive because the deal was a carve-out where the accounting and operational records had to be disentangled from those of the parent organization (Clariant). It was orchestrated by Robert Easton and Zeina Bain. The expanded team included not only members of The Carlyle Group and its operating companies, but also Ken Greatbatch, a carve-out specialist, and some 100 other external advisors from Clifford Chance, PwC, A.T. Kearney, ERM, Aon and Accenture.
Additionally, UBS, the investment banker, was involved as the potential arranger and syndicator of the debt financing.
- Buyout
- Due diligence
- Managing transition
- Turnaround management
- Leverage
- Incentives
- Restructuring
Cranfield University
Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Fax +44 (0)1234 751125
Email [email protected]
Harvard Business School Publishing
60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]
Babson College
Babson Park, Wellesley MA 02457, USA
Tel +1 781 239 5884
Fax +1 781 239 5885
Email [email protected]
NUCB Business School
1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]
IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-7-2450 ©2023