Workers today are increasingly motivated by high quality of life, flexible working, and opportunities to train on the job, whereas previously, remuneration was the driving force behind their desire to stick at their jobs…
World Talent Ranking 2021
Switzerland leads the top 10 economies in the IMD 2021 World Talent Ranking 2021, showing a pandemic-induced trend in which employees are more motivated in more competitive economies and less so in non-competitive ones.
Sweden is 2nd (up from 5th in 2020 in the same ranking), Luxembourg 3rd (also 3rd in 2020), Norway 4th, and Denmark 5th. Switzerland has been ranked number 1 for five years in a row.
The Institute for Management Development’s World Competitiveness Center take a three-pronged approach in measuring talent in economies.
- The Investment & Development factor measures the resources earmarked to cultivate a homegrown workforce.
- The Appeal factor evaluates the extent to which an economy attracts foreign and retains local talent.
- And the Readiness factor measures the quality of the skills and competencies that are available in a country’s talent pool.

2021 Results
People’s motivation for work during the pandemic has proven crucial for economic success, IMD’s World Talent Ranking 2021 finds.
Workers today are increasingly motivated by high quality of life, flexible working, and opportunities to train on the job, whereas previously, remuneration was the driving force behind their desire to stick at their jobs.
This is a major finding in 2021’s IMD World Talent Ranking, which each year measures worker motivation, quality of life, and employee training as three criteria among 31. Responses to questions on these criteria are among those gathered in a survey of executives in 64 economies across the world, and placed alongside hard data to form the bigger picture.
2021 | Country | 2020 | Ranking Change | |
1 | Switzerland | 1 | - | - |
2 | Sweden | 5 | +3 | ↑ |
3 | Luxembourg | 3 | - | - |
4 | Norway | 7 | +3 | ↑ |
5 | Denmark | 2 | -3 | ↓ |
6 | Austria | 6 | - | - |
7 | Iceland | 4 | -3 | ↓ |
8 | Finland | 12 | +4 | ↑ |
9 | Netherlands | 10 | +1 | ↑ |
10 | Germany | 11 | +1 | ↑ |
11 | Hong Kong SAR | 14 | +3 | ↑ |
12 | Singapore | 9 | -3 | ↓ |
13 | Belgium | 16 | +3 | ↑ |
14 | USA | 15 | +1 | ↑ |
15 | Canada | 8 | -7 | ↓ |
16 | Taiwan, China | 20 | +4 | ↑ |
17 | Ireland | 18 | +1 | ↑ |
18 | New Zealand | 21 | +3 | ↑ |
19 | Estonia | 19 | - | - |
20 | Australia | 13 | -7 | ↓ |
21 | United Kingdom | 23 | +2 | ↑ |
22 | Israel | 22 | - | - |
23 | UAE | 24 | +1 | ↑ |
24 | Cyprus | 17 | -7 | ↓ |
25 | France | 28 | +3 | ↑ |
26 | Portugal | 26 | - | - |
27 | Slovenia | 30 | +3 | ↑ |
28 | Malaysia | 25 | -3 | ↓ |
29 | Lithuania | 27 | -2 | ↓ |
30 | Latvia | 33 | +3 | ↑ |
31 | Qatar | 29 | -2 | ↓ |
32 | Spain | 32 | - | - |
33 | Greece | 37 | +4 | ↑ |
34 | Korea Rep. | 31 | -3 | ↓ |
35 | Italy | 36 | +1 | ↑ |
36 | China | 40 | +4 | ↑ |
37 | Czech Republic | 39 | +2 | ↑ |
38 | Saudi Arabia | 34 | -4 | ↓ |
39 | Japan | 38 | -1 | ↓ |
40 | Jordan | 49 | +9 | ↑ |
41 | Kazakhstan | 44 | +3 | ↑ |
42 | Hungary | 50 | +8 | ↑ |
43 | Thailand | 43 | - | - |
44 | Botswana | new | ||
45 | Poland | 35 | -10 | ↓ |
46 | Ukraine | 42 | -4 | ↓ |
47 | Russia | 54 | +7 | ↑ |
48 | Chile | 41 | -7 | ↓ |
49 | Croatia | 53 | +4 | ↑ |
50 | Indonesia | 45 | -5 | ↓ |
51 | Romania | 57 | +6 | ↑ |
52 | Slovak Republic | 61 | +9 | ↑ |
53 | Turkey | 46 | -7 | ↓ |
54 | Argentina | 47 | -7 | ↓ |
55 | Colombia | 58 | +3 | ↑ |
56 | India | 62 | +6 | ↑ |
57 | Philippines | 48 | -9 | ↓ |
58 | Bulgaria | 55 | -3 | ↓ |
59 | Mexico | 56 | -3 | ↓ |
60 | Brazil | 59 | -1 | ↓ |
61 | Mongolia | 63 | +2 | ↑ |
62 | Peru | 51 | -11 | ↓ |
63 | South Africa | 52 | -11 | ↓ |
64 | Venezuela | 60 | -4 | ↓ |
2021 Report
Methodology in a nutshell
- The IMD World Talent Ranking (WTR) assesses the status and the development of competencies necessary for enterprises and the economy to achieve long term value creation. It does so by using a set of indicators which measure the development, retention and attraction of a domestic and international highly-skilled workforce.
- Based on our research, the methodology of the World Talent Ranking defines Talent Competitiveness into three main factors:
- Investment and Development
- Appeal
- Readiness
- These 3 factors comprise 31 criteria, although each factor does not necessarily have the same number of criteria (for example, it takes more criteria to assess Readiness than to evaluate Investment and Development).
- Each factor, independently of the number of criteria it contains, has the same weight in the overall consolidation of results that is 1/3 (3x33.3 ~100).
- Criteria can be hard data, which analyze talent development as it can be measured (e.g. Total Public Expenditure on Education) or soft data, which analyze the quality of these investments as they can be perceived (e.g. Management Education).
- Finally, to compute the overall World Talent Ranking, we aggregate the criteria to calculate the scores of each factor which function as the basis to generate the overall ranking.
World Talent ranking factors
The investment in and development of home-grown talent
The extent to which a country taps into the overseas talent pool
The availability of skills and competencies in the talent pool
Computing the Rankings
